by Kyrian » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:09 pm
On the melee scale, I'm very much in an analytical mode. I evaluate forces and threats on both a threat level and distance from me. I see where there are gaps (and there always are) and the people who are passing into those gaps. I scan for major "power players", i.e., the ones who can tear up your side if you give them a chance, and note where they are and where they're moving to. I watch the general sides and how the battle is developing. For example, I'll see our left side collapsing and try to get some people over there to slow them down. If I see that we have overwhelming local superiority, i.e., an area where we outnumber the other side in combat power and/or numbers (they're not necessarily the same), then I try to direct them to take advantage of that. If I had to use an analogy, then I'd probably use some of the approaches you might use in a real-time-strategy game: Identify the enemy's locations, gauge the enemy's capabilities, determine the strengths and weakness of both sides, apply combat power to the enemy's weaknesses, and avoid exposing your weaknesses.
At an individual level, say when there are multiple opponents and I'm the only one left, I tend to shut off the analysis and let the "lizard brain", i.e., instinctual and sensory responses take over. I can recall several times when I could not easily remember what I did only the way it felt.
"...change requires action, it doesn't just happen. Define your actions by how you think the game should be, not how the game is. The game will follow."--Big Jimmy