by Kyrian » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:31 pm
I know I'm resurrecting a dead thread but I finally was able to collect my thoughts on the subject.
Like anything else we do, I’ve found that the main way to develop large-scale melee awareness is to practice it and to train with the specific goal of improving it. That can be a real challenge especially when you don’t have an opportunity to see, much less participate in, battles with over 100 per side. While I think I’ve gotten much better at large-scale field awareness, I still do have moments when I suffer from information overload.
One way I’ve learned to overcome this is by being an archer. As an archer, I’m now responsible for covering a much large area, not simply the area in my forward field of view. I can’t afford to suffer from tunnel vision or else I’ll get charged by a melee fighter or countersniped by an enemy archer. What works for me is what I call, for lack of better terms, perception prioritization or perception focus. It’s not possible to focus on everything so I consciously make an effort to focus only on the things that matter to me. As an archer, these are:
1) Enemy archers and potentially javelins, depending on how close I am to the line.
2) Wave motion. I’ll go into that more in just a bit.
3) Gaps.
4) Leaders/Power fighters/power units
1) Enemy archers are pretty straightforward. They would just as well kill you before you kill them. I need to know where the other archers are and figure out whether they’re planning a firing solution on me or my teammates. They also represent a potentially unseen threat as they can kill me outside of my local field of view. If I end up close to the line, javelins can also be an issue even if they don’t actually kill me. A javelin flying towards me can cause me to dodge and lose my shot or actually hit my bow or arrow.
2) Wave motion is how I characterize the ebb and flow of the battle—where the potential breakthroughs may occur, where the large masses or small groups of people are moving, and where the lines are holding. As an analogy, when waves hit a beach during a windy day, there are different pockets of movement hitting the beach with seemingly no recognizable patterns especially when you look at a small section of the beach. However, if you step back and start looking at larger and larger chunks of the beach, you start to discern patterns such as waves crashing at the same spot due to an abrupt change in the depth of the sea floor.
I believe this is the key to maintaining focus in a large melee. It may seem counter-intuitive but if you stop looking at all of the individual engagements and instead start looking at the larger picture and how the “waves” are developing, you no longer have to keep watching everything.
In addition, I will divide the battle line into the left, right, and center. Now, instead of looking at lots of individual engagements, I’m looking at three different sections of the battle and that dramatically reduces the amount of information I have to process. Typically as a field battle develops, you’ll see things happen either on the flanks or in the center. My thought process will go something like this: "left needs reinforcing--gaps in the center--watch those gaps--right is holding--right is starting to budge--need some reinforcing on the right--breakthrough on far right flank--right flank is collapsing--need to shift over to support--can't get there in time--need to move and let everyone know."
3) Gaps are often the means for exploiting the opponent’s line. There may be gaps due to people shifting or because one or two power fighters are occupying at least twice their number. Less experienced fighters will tend to clump creating these gaps that can be exploited by aggressive action. The ideal is not giving the enemy gaps to go through or doing it intentionally to bait them while forcing them to create gaps for you to take advantage of. Those gaps are the bane of archers as they’re often the “highways” to rush the archers and either run them down or at least disrupt their firing process.
4) The importance of power fighters and power units to your thought process can’t be emphasized enough. These are individuals or units that can really affect the outcome of the battle due to their high skill level and often, high mobility, as well as groups of fighters who are very good at fighting together. A power unit can wreak major havoc as they move through and gimp or kill the fighters around them. Skilled and vocal leaders can reinforce and shift forces as needed as well as inspire the troops.
As an exercise, if you’re on the sidelines taking a break, try watching the battles as an objective observer. After a while, you should start to see the patterns of how the lines meet, where the breakthroughs occur, and most importantly, why they occur. You can also start wargaming these in your head. For example, if you see a gap develop, consider how you would exploit that gap and who you would send. A strong line unit probably wouldn’t be the best group to take advantage of that but a high-mobility skirmishing unit would cause a lot of havoc once it got through the line. Also, if you can, try to get on higher ground to observe the battles. It’s why you normally saw commanders on horses and the highest ground they could find—it gave you the largest field of view possible.
Unit battles tend to be a somewhat different animal than field battles since you have “blobs” of people moving around the battlefield either to avoid another group or to actively engage a group quickly. You will see the “waves” develop but normally on a smaller scale and, by their nature, the battles tend to be much more chaotic. Also, many engagements tend to take place at the edges of the battlefield where a unit can use the edge of the world as an impenetrable and unflankable barrier. I think the general chain of thought is, if you’re a smaller unit, to avoid all of the larger units or try to draw them into engaging each other while trying to conserve your strength until you mop up at the end.
Much of this leads to deciding where you'll be the most effective and a big part of that is your own self-awareness. If you like to run, then taking advantage of gaps or skirmishing is probably where you want to be. If you like the line, then supporting a section of the line is most likely your best bet.
Hope this helps.
"...change requires action, it doesn't just happen. Define your actions by how you think the game should be, not how the game is. The game will follow."--Big Jimmy