Moderator: Belegarth: Forum Moderators
Relg wrote:He didn't take like five hits because of this "rule".
BoW wrote:1.3. The target of an attack makes combat hit determinations.
Giggles wrote:Relg is the only one in the scenario offering a perspective. Everyone else is just speculating and riffing on what Relg is claiming to be true. I understand that to move the discussion forward we've got to assume that Relg is speaking the truth, but in my experience, there's usually two or more sides to a story; especially when part of the story involves a vendetta against someone on the internet. Relg has less than a year of experience. Same goes for the cheater in question. I'm not calling anyone a liar, but I'm not calling anyone a cheater either.BoW wrote:1.3. The target of an attack makes combat hit determinations.
Giggles wrote:IMO, It's pretty weak (and disrespectful) to * about a realm-mate on the boards. If you've got beef, deal with it in a positive and helpful way to their face.
Giggles wrote:
Sometimes a light shot is just a light shot.BoW wrote:1.3. The target of an attack makes combat hit determinations.
Giggles wrote:Turning up the heat on a suspected sluffer is always kind of a gamble and usually a last resort. If you're gonna crank it, don't be a * about it. Do it with the intent to keep the fight fair, not to send your target to the emergency room. If you break somebody's nose or fingers because you were trying to teach them a lesson about hit-taking, you just lost all your credibility and hopefully, somebody gets sued.
p_quick wrote:and PS no one is gunna get sued because everyone (at least everyone should) have signed a waiver.
Bishop wrote:Overall I believe the article was positive for our image, loosely defining us as a sadomasochist anti-larp. I'm ok with that. http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/LARP-harder
Caleidah wrote:But, his sensei passed that style down to him! Literal hours of tradition!
Warthog wrote:Good game! I play sports!
Giggles wrote:I'm not saying that all of the advice offered is ****, but I strongly believe that whine-fest threads like this one are better off not being made or encouraged. I fail to see any use for this thread other than as a hugbox for people who can't deal with their own problems and as a soapbox for tough guys to stand on and bore us with their tough guy stories. That said, this is going to be my only reply. If you want to take it to me, do it in a PM, please.
IMO, It's pretty weak (and disrespectful) to * about a realm-mate on the boards. If you've got beef, deal with it in a positive and helpful way to their face.
Relg is the only one in the scenario offering a perspective. Everyone else is just speculating and riffing on what Relg is claiming to be true. I understand that to move the discussion forward we've got to assume that Relg is speaking the truth, but in my experience, there's usually two or more sides to a story; especially when part of the story involves a vendetta against someone on the internet. Relg has less than a year of experience. Same goes for the cheater in question. I'm not calling anyone a liar, but I'm not calling anyone a cheater either.
Sometimes a light shot is just a light shot.
Turning up the heat on a suspected sluffer is always kind of a gamble and usually a last resort. If you're gonna crank it, don't be a * about it. Do it with the intent to keep the fight fair, not to send your target to the emergency room. If you break somebody's nose or fingers because you were trying to teach them a lesson about hit-taking, you just lost all your credibility and hopefully, somebody gets sued.BoW wrote:1.3. The target of an attack makes combat hit determinations.
p_quick wrote:So you seem to believe you are a higher caliber person because you can go hug some trees and solve everyone's hit taking problems in a non-violent way. well good for you Mr. Green, keep living the dream. We play a full contact sport, not a touch feely don't wanna hurt anyones feelings game, this isn't (and i mean no offense) middle school girls soccer. It is belegarth, so grow a pair, if you wanna play a game where no one gets hurt go play wow, and don't waist people's time with soap-box umbrella accusations.
and PS no one is gunna get sued because everyone (at least everyone should) have signed a waiver.
Warthog wrote:Good game! I play sports!
Spike wrote:
Well, I've seen a lot of comments and videos regarding your fighting style, Petar. Up until now I've never seen any of your fighting philosophy. I'm glad I read this. It's taught me alot.
Soo Ma Tai wrote:Couple things.
1. A waiver does not stop anyone from sueing the group or an individual. It only provides a deterrant and a bit of legal weight. The likelyhood of being sued is really slim, but it can happen.
2. If you are hitting someone with the ~intent to harm~ them, you are not protected by the waiver. At that point you are being negligent.
Soo Ma Tai wrote:Couple things.
1. A waiver does not stop anyone from sueing the group or an individual. It only provides a deterrant and a bit of legal weight. The likelyhood of being sued is really slim, but it can happen.
2. If you are hitting someone with the ~intent to harm~ them, you are not protected by the waiver. At that point you are being negligent.
Relg wrote:If I wished to deal with your disrespect, Giggles, I would have asked for it.
Relg wrote:I fail to see how seeking a way to make the game more fun for everyone is considered whining. There's a little thing called tact. Perhaps its time you got some.
Anastasia of Chamonix wrote: Eventually, everyone is only taking hits that bruise and no one is having any fun.
-Anastasia of Chamonix
p_quick wrote:you didn't get my joke
Anastasia of Chamonix wrote:Seriously?!
What if people aren't taking my hits because I weigh half as much as they do and therefore can't hit them hard enough according to their standards.
Brennon EH wrote:I'll be honest, I take light and swing moderately hard. I'm not really interested in if you're hitting me 'hard enough', I'm more interested that I screwed up a block, timed something poorly, or had bad footwork.
Brennon EH wrote:There are occasions when I will tell people that a shot didn't connect.
Big Jimmy wrote:Anastasia of Chamonix wrote:Seriously?!
What if people aren't taking my hits because I weigh half as much as they do and therefore can't hit them hard enough according to their standards.
While I understand that this is Belegarth, and "sufficient force" is subjective, if you don't have the umph to score a hit, you don't have the umph to score a hit. Really sorry you're (going by your example, not fact) helpless on the field.
Arrakis wrote:I've yet to find the mythical noodly-armed twelve year old female fighter that can't throw a shot with sufficient force. All I've found so far are a lot of people who don't have much muscle mass and have psyched themselves out of being able to throw a good shot.
Anastasia of Chamonix wrote:BTW: I would say that 20% of fighters say I hit hard. I hear a lot of "ugh-oof" with my torso shots. Main point here is that everyone has a bar for what they will except as a good hit. I have a low bar for "taking", a high bar for "hitting" (I think this is best). Some people have a higher "taking bar" than their "hitting bar," meaning they want you to take their shots, before they would be taking the same force as a good hit. Not always, but sometimes, these are big guys-who claim "no one is hitting them hard enough." I believe this is one type of rhino and is more likely to show up on fields that encourage "hitting harder" in order to solve the rhino problem.
Thanks,
Anastasia of Chamonix
Anastasia of Chamonix wrote:You are missing the point. Most people who don't weigh 300 lbs can't hit as hard as the person who weighs 300 lbs. This is a reality of force. I have played on many national fields and I have no problems with 90% of fighters. I maintain that the 10% that I do have problems with are shrugging good shots because they need a bruise before they take the hit (and trust me...they don't bruise easy).
Bishop wrote:Overall I believe the article was positive for our image, loosely defining us as a sadomasochist anti-larp. I'm ok with that. http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/LARP-harder
Caleidah wrote:But, his sensei passed that style down to him! Literal hours of tradition!
p_quick wrote:AoC don't worry about it and good luck with grad school :)
Return to Fighting Skill Development & Training
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests