It is currently Mon Oct 22, 2018 1:28 pm


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:14 pm 
Recruit
Recruit

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:53 pm
Posts: 8
Location: San Diego, California
Started Fighting: 16 Aug 2015
Realm: Andor
The Book of War does not explicitly state what the minimum dimensions of a striking surface must be. The rules we are given are these:
Quote:
4.1.1. Striking surface: Padded surface of a weapon designed to make contact with a combatant during combat. Only the striking surface of a weapon may score a hit.

4.5.1. Two and one-half inch rule (6.35 cm): No surface on a striking edge (sword tip, arrow/bolt head, spear head, javelin head, etc.) whether designed for stabbing or not, may readily pass more than one-half (1/2) inch (1.3 cm) through a two and one-half (2 1/2) inch (6.35 cm) hole.

4.5.1.1. The weapon tip is exempt from the two and one-half (2 1/2) inch (6.35 cm) rule, rule 4.5.1, if the weapon has a semicircular tip with a minimum one and one-half (1 ½) inch (3.81 cm) radius.

Effectively, then, the minimum striking surface dimensions are determined by physics. The weapon and its striking surface should have the integrity to not break too quickly, the weapon must end up delivering safe and reasonably nice strikes, and the weapon's striking surface can't fit through too small of a hole.

So, veteran foamsmiths of the Bel boards, what is your advice to reasonably experienced foamsmiths regarding building a weapon with minimal striking surface? In particular, what width, length, and depth of striking surface would you suggest for different weapon types and weights?


Top
 OfflineProfile  
 Post subject: Re: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Wed Apr 12, 2017 3:29 pm 
Slayer
Slayer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:21 pm
Posts: 1037
Location: Carbondale, IL
Started Fighting: 02 Apr 2006
Realm: Carthage
Unit: Clan of the Hydra
Favorite Fighting Styles: Red Sword - S&B - Florentine
It really is objective, but you should consider how a weapon can be used, and at what length it would be safe to swing.

For a blue, I'd say 6-8" is about as small as you can get away with. Hammers tend to have a good amount of courtesy padding, so I've seen them pass with 4" of striking. The width of the head extending past the sides also makes the bladed area more obvious; if there isn't a clear point where haft ends and blade begins, the weapon will likely fail, as any user that picked it up could have trouble discerning what is or is not safe to strike with.

Getting into reds, I've seen min-reds with about 12" of padding pass just fine. They're kind of min-glaive styled. For full glaives, I shoot for 28-36" of padding. Less than that makes me personally uncomfortable. I've seen pole-hammers pass with 12" of padding, but only a couple, and they were quickly retired. Hafting was a huge issue with those hammers.

It's hard to pin down, but I hope that helps.

_________________
Realm of Carthage War Council Representative
Squire to Sir Morpheus of Wolfpack of the High Plains
Realm Map Curator


Top
 OfflineProfile  
 Post subject: Re: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:33 am 
Recruit
Recruit

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:53 pm
Posts: 8
Location: San Diego, California
Started Fighting: 16 Aug 2015
Realm: Andor
Definitely helps! Thank you. I had not even considered what a difference a hammer head would make.
Could what you said about hammers be assumed for axes and maces too? And does an omni-directional striking surface make a difference here versus a flat blade?


Top
 OfflineProfile  
 Post subject: Re: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:59 am 
Slayer
Slayer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:21 pm
Posts: 1037
Location: Carbondale, IL
Started Fighting: 02 Apr 2006
Realm: Carthage
Unit: Clan of the Hydra
Favorite Fighting Styles: Red Sword - S&B - Florentine
To a point I'm sure omnis make checkers less anxious about small amounts of striking surface, but aside from hammers I've never really seen any exceptions.

Just ask yourself: would I feel safe if someone were swinging this at me? Would I be confident that their strikes were with the blade, and not the haft?

_________________
Realm of Carthage War Council Representative
Squire to Sir Morpheus of Wolfpack of the High Plains
Realm Map Curator


Top
 OfflineProfile  
 Post subject: Re: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:36 pm 
Recruit
Recruit

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 8:53 pm
Posts: 8
Location: San Diego, California
Started Fighting: 16 Aug 2015
Realm: Andor
Thanks again for the insight. Strange that hammers are such an anomaly.


Top
 OfflineProfile  
 Post subject: Re: Minimal Striking Surface
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:19 pm 
Slayer
Slayer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:21 pm
Posts: 1037
Location: Carbondale, IL
Started Fighting: 02 Apr 2006
Realm: Carthage
Unit: Clan of the Hydra
Favorite Fighting Styles: Red Sword - S&B - Florentine
That's just my personal observation. I'd think probably because they're so rare, and most people visualize hammers as, by nature, having a relatively small head. I can't really say for certain

_________________
Realm of Carthage War Council Representative
Squire to Sir Morpheus of Wolfpack of the High Plains
Realm Map Curator


Top
 OfflineProfile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
GuildWarsAlliance Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net. Modified by