Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 1:10 pm
by Spike
... treason?

Tell me that all this is some sick April Fools Joke.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:43 pm
by Xooyan
SirMADOG wrote:
I have friends and family in the military, all still alive thank god, they feel like they are serving Halliburton.


You're kidding right? This is not treason nor is it strike material.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 4:15 pm
by Akbar the Foul
This is Chris's sister. Some FBI agents showed up about two hours ago and took him into custody. I don't know what the hell you people here got him into but I'm contacting an attorney.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:00 pm
by Oisin
I assume Akbar's last post is an April Fool's Day joke.

And honestly, a strike for treason? * it, Madog, that's absolutely ridiculous. Regardless of whether or not the statement was accurate, and my view would likely hold it as closer to accurate than yours, it's not treason under any American definition of the word (except maybe of those Americans whose opinions about what's acceptable can be roughly but accurately described as fascist), and it's not striking material.

If that's how you're going to mod the forums, pushing your own radical political agenda, then maybe you need to step down as a moderator.

EDIT: How's this as food for thought. Every one of those 4000 soldiers who has died in Iraq, and the millions more who have died in previous wars, swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America which includes, among many other things, the right to freedom of expression. And you are accusing an individual for treason based on their expression of an opinion? Tough **** if you don't agree with him, Constitutional rights aren't there to protect popular opinions, they're there to protect unpopular ones.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:12 pm
by Derian
I probably should have posted something earlier, but this has been handled, no need to worry.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:41 pm
by The Great Gigsby
Did he just need his diapers changed, or what? Was it gas?

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:39 am
by Juicer
Wait wait wait. Let me get this straight. So someone can post this:

Crynolynn wrote:Image


Saying that a demon cat is going to devour the baby, and no strike is given. But the moment I arm the baby to take on dangerous felines and even give it a sweet lion's head to help intimidate the cat, I get a strike?

Just seems a bit inconsistent to me.

And what was the other strike for? Just curious.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:07 am
by Dabbanoth
Oisin wrote:step down as a moderator.


Oisin, the rest of your post was equally awesome to this part, but i feel that this particular part should be reiterated for effect

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:21 am
by Oisin
I assume you might be referring to me, not Elebrim? ;-)

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:06 am
by Tor
SirMADOG wrote:Tor 1st Strike for defamation of character(illegal)
http://belegarth.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=25433


You're not even stretching at this point.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:38 pm
by Dabbanoth
My bad Oisin, 6 AM, about to leave for school posts are never a good idea

Edited for proper credit

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:45 pm
by Big King Jimmy
Derian wrote:I probably should have posted something earlier, but this has been handled, no need to worry.


How?

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:10 pm
by Xooyan
Derian wrote:I probably should have posted something earlier, but this has been handled, no need to worry.


If it has been handled in the fashion you suggested to me earlier then I think the strikes should be removed. As long as they remain in this thread, the strikes appear official and could be used to count against those individuals in the future.

You may consider just stating the issue in full and getting this over with.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:23 pm
by Derian
My intentions are that strikes will be unnecessary once the new rules are in effect. It's not a good system.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:53 pm
by Ilariia Bulochnika
Being one of the afore-mentioned 'individuals', I can say I trust Derian's word that it has been handled and will be further adjusted in the future.

Thanks for all your hard work, folks.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:25 pm
by Xooyan
Derian wrote:My intentions are that strikes will be unnecessary once the new rules are in effect. It's not a good system.


Thank you for clarifying. I appreciate that you will do away with the strikes.

hmm

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:55 pm
by 孙悟安
uhh...what the hell?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:44 pm
by Cyric
Image

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 9:53 pm
by Jothardin the Cruel
Madog has been abusing his authority on the board and the strike and ban system for a long time.

It's time for the War Council to remove him.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:02 pm
by Thorondor
Jothardin the Cruel wrote:Madog has been abusing his authority on the board and the strike and ban system for a long time.

It's time for the War Council to remove him.


Holy **** he's alive...

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:12 pm
by Arrakis
Everyone - Ig'nance.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:57 pm
by Enoch
De'Mox: Strike x2 for repeated threats of physical violence and excessive profanities, to be found in both GM and WCGD.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 11:20 am
by Jothardin the Cruel
Ta da!