It is currently Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:01 pm


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 3.6.4 and 3.8 conflicting
PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 10:33 am 
Underling
Underling
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 81
Started Fighting: 19 Apr 2009
Realm: Thunder Guard
Favorite Fighting Styles: Sword and board, spear
Quote:
3.6.4. Weapons that strike both armored and unarmored target areas are considered to have hit the unarmored target area.
3.8. A hit that strikes both the body AND either an arm or a leg is assumed to have hit the body.

These two rules don't reconcile with one another if the target has an armored torso and an unarmored arm or leg. The intent here appears to be to have the target take the more harmful option - Losing a limb is generally more harmful than losing torso armor.

Possible change, could say that 3.6.4 takes precedence:
Quote:
3.8. A hit that strikes both the body AND either an arm or a leg is assumed to have hit the body. Rule 3.6.4 takes precedence over this rule.

Or if we want to avoid jumping around the BoW:
Quote:
3.8. A hit that strikes both the body AND either an arm or a leg is assumed to have hit the body, unless the body is armored and the arm or leg is not armored.

_________________
Ranting about the BoW so you don't have to.
(More rants here: http://board.belegarth.com/viewforum.php?f=66)


Top
 OfflineProfile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
GuildWarsAlliance Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net. Modified by