by Domoviyr » Sun Dec 04, 2005 5:56 pm
I personally think that there are two drastically different types of fighting: head-on-head field fighting and guerilla warfare. Each of these requires the use of their own types of tactics.
Head-On-Head Field Fighting is what happens when you have a wide open space with plenty of room to manuevre. The goal is to break your enemies unity and to kill them without decreasing your own. The bigger and better organized the group, the better it does at field fights. Larger weapons are often prefered for incredible offense, as are large shields for protection. Arrows tend to be the most effective missile because they have a longer range and decreased rate of deflection then the javie.
Guerilla Warfare (like the kind often used in Woods Battles) is another matter entirely. Where field battles are often decided by sheer brute force, a certain level of cunning is needed to excell in a guerilla situation. The goal is to isolate your enemy and kill him quickly without him being able to call for reinforcement and to fade into the forest as if you were never there. Lightning speed and efficiancy are the most favorable qualities here. It is beneficial to operate in small, well organized groups (after all, small groups are more manageable and better at sneaking than larger ones). Small weapons and shields practical for swift, silenct movement are best in this scenario. I find javies to be of specific use in this arena for they are not only useful as missile weapons (often close-range is all that is possible) but they can be good hand-to-hand weapons as well. The efficiancy of arrows strictly depends on the terrain, open forests meaning that arrow work well, and heavily vegetated forests being a hinderance to arrow usefulness.
Victory favors neither the righteous nor the wicked. It favors the prepared.
Ravager Direwolf of the Uruk-Hai