Moderator: Belegarth: Forum Moderators
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Sir Par wrote:Using the losse definition of "modern" we agreed on being before the year 1700 I compiled my list of period hats
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Blackwolfe wrote:what about the berret, the tall hat and the cavalier?
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Big King Jimmy wrote:Par, this is awesome. Thank you.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Ilariia Bulochnika wrote:Or throw everyone off and be a Scotsman! :devil:
Liam_McClung wrote:As a guy who burns rather easily, I really appreciate this list. It also settles a debate between me and Lach as to whether or not the Tricorne is garb. I won.
Blackwolfe wrote:Liam_McClung wrote:As a guy who burns rather easily, I really appreciate this list. It also settles a debate between me and Lach as to whether or not the Tricorne is garb. I won.
Well, you win now due to new Presidential definitions. The Tricorne is NOT a medieval hat.
Ilariia Bulochnika wrote:Or throw everyone off and be a Scotsman! :devil:
Giggles wrote:The tricorn is not a medieval hat, *.
Giggles wrote:The tricorn is not a medieval hat, *.
edit: Bah. This is why you shouldn't drink and post.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Soo Ma Tai wrote:If that's all you've got on, you'll be asked to go get dressed at CW. UA is not garb, and must be covered by a tabard at minimum.
Akbar the Foul wrote:If only everyone had my sweet disposition, then we could all get along.
Todo wrote:Soo Ma Tai wrote:If that's all you've got on, you'll be asked to go get dressed at CW. UA is not garb, and must be covered by a tabard at minimum.
All ya gotta do is cover up the symbols and that's totes legit.
Forkbeard wrote:So, you can't decide if that is Galya or Par? I have to admit, I mistake Par for an old woman regularly. But Galya is a beautiful and intelligent lady. I'd never mistake her for him.
Galya wrote:Todo wrote:Soo Ma Tai wrote:If that's all you've got on, you'll be asked to go get dressed at CW. UA is not garb, and must be covered by a tabard at minimum.
All ya gotta do is cover up the symbols and that's totes legit.
Says the man who won "Worst Garb" at Chaos this year.
Akbar the Foul wrote:If only everyone had my sweet disposition, then we could all get along.
Galya wrote:Todo wrote:Soo Ma Tai wrote:If that's all you've got on, you'll be asked to go get dressed at CW. UA is not garb, and must be covered by a tabard at minimum.
All ya gotta do is cover up the symbols and that's totes legit.
Says the man who won "Worst Garb" at Chaos this year.
Derian wrote:Well, ****. Par is right.
Akbar the Foul wrote:If only everyone had my sweet disposition, then we could all get along.
Arrakis wrote:Excellent work! Good on you for putting this together.
My only word of caution would be that modern versions of traditional hats produced as "folk-wear" type pieces in other countries often share as much similarity (and as many differences) as modern "historical" headwear in America does.
Just 'cause it's foreign and they call it a word that was also used for a historical hat (probably because it means "hat" in that particular language) doesn't mean it's garb.
Return to Medieval Arts, Sciences, and Garb
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest