Moderator: Belegarth: Forum Moderators
Ticonderoga wrote:i just completley forgot about the book of war
Ticonderoga wrote:I have read it a few times allready and i just looked through it again.
Caleidah wrote:Ticonderoga wrote:i just completley forgot about the book of war
Go read it again. Then read it a third time. That will clear up a lot of your issues.
'Caleidah wrote:Ticonderoga wrote:i just completley forgot about the book of war
Go read it again. Then read it a third time. That will clear up a lot of your issues.
Koom Di' Puts wrote:And here I thought the point of the game was to have fun?
Savage wrote: I find that beer often aids in this process.
Ticonderoga wrote:And if all else fails. I'm getting my mom.
Forkbeard wrote:[And]I'm going to continue being a happy sword weilding wierdo until then.
FB
Glass wrote:To be perfectly honest, I don't know if this is feasible. A. no pommel to check. B. his arm is instantly a punching weapon, which are against the rules. if it were attached perpendicular... well, it wouldnt be a realistic way of fighting.
Ticonderoga wrote:well he's missing his arm from just avove his elbow so i dont think a bow is going to work
Here's a pic of Maul wearing his curved buckler:Thurat wrote:Maul from Beornve has a really wicked shoulder shield that you should ask him about. It might be just what you're looking for.
Forkbeard wrote:No, you can not strap any weapon to yourself.
Fb
Thurat wrote:Forkbeard wrote:No, you can not strap any weapon to yourself.
Fb
Fork, could you support that with a rule from the BoW? I don't recall anything saying that a weapon had to be held in a hand to be swung. If a weapon is properly padded and safely and securely attached, I fail to see it's illegality.
As well, as this would be an accommodation for a special population fighter, if such a rule exists could an exception not be made? I understand that you have made numerous arguments against bending the rules to make it easier for other people to play, such as the sash thing that the St. Louis realm was trying out, but this seems to be a horse of a different color.
Thurat wrote:I agree that fighting left would be a tremendous advantage to the guy, but if he insists on fighting righty, then I don't see how making an attachable flail would be a violation of the BoW. It isn't worn, it would be no more dangerous than any other weapon flying out-of-hand if detached, and that rule is the anti-anviling rule, and is not really applicable in this case.
I concede that the argument to make a shield rather than a modified weapon is better, and more likely to pass everywhere, but it doesn't hurt to hash out all possibilities; that's how we progress as a sport.
Glass wrote:So by your thoughts, i can attach weapons to my legs and swing them at people? That would make things interesting. If there is no hand the weapon, it can't count. And I agree with the anviling, punch blocking would b impossible for him. On top of that, with his severely shortened arm, throwing any shots without an elbow would be unable to make an effective strike.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests