Moderator: Belegarth: Forum Moderators
Noik wrote:And Beck that was dumb.
Forkbeard wrote:This Beck kid is a moron.
FB
Graavish wrote:it's not the weight of the weapon that makes for a solid hit, it's how much i don't like you when i'm swinging.
Graavish wrote:it's not the weight of the weapon that makes for a solid hit, it's how much i don't like you when i'm swinging.
Noik wrote:And Beck that was dumb.
Forkbeard wrote:This Beck kid is a moron.
FB
Becket wrote:Skiddy, that shot was pretty much one of the best I've seen. It looked like amt, was it.
Becket wrote:I don't know where you got the 'vet vs noob thing'
Becket wrote:I've been fighting for going on two years and just advanced to killing a vet about 15-20% of the time.
Graavish wrote:it's not the weight of the weapon that makes for a solid hit, it's how much i don't like you when i'm swinging.
You're right. We really had to reach.
Skiddy wrote:And why is it bad that he's tracking his progress based on how well he fights superior fighters?
Dane wrote:"Vet" is a subjective term.
Slagar wrote:A corrollary to this is that one realm's 'vets' often suck compared to another realms noobs. The size of the pond you play at affects things too.
I guess what I'm saying is don't get too hung up on the distinction, and whether or not you're a 'vet'. Just play, and try to improve (if that's what you're in it for). Let other people worry about semantics.
Graavish wrote:it's not the weight of the weapon that makes for a solid hit, it's how much i don't like you when i'm swinging.
And why is it bad that he's learning from people better than him? Even if he can't know if it's the best possible learning option.Dane wrote:Skiddy wrote:And why is it bad that he's tracking his progress based on how well he fights superior fighters?Dane wrote:"Vet" is a subjective term.Slagar wrote:A corrollary to this is that one realm's 'vets' often suck compared to another realms noobs. The size of the pond you play at affects things too.
I guess what I'm saying is don't get too hung up on the distinction, and whether or not you're a 'vet'. Just play, and try to improve (if that's what you're in it for). Let other people worry about semantics.
*sigh*
Skiddy wrote:You're right. We really had to reach.
Well, in what other way would you have him denote "the older more experienced fighters"? And why is it bad that he's tracking his progress based on how well he fights superior fighters? I mean... that's only been a major factor in every quality fighters rise. I realize veteran doesn't necessarily imply skill, however when you've been fighting for that relatively short amount of time, often you will just get out-experienced even if you faster, harder and smarter. Albeit you will probably surpass that person, once you've decided that you are motivated enough to not just become that guy.
Bo wrote:but it is better than what i put in your mouth last night, zing
Graavish wrote:it's not the weight of the weapon that makes for a solid hit, it's how much i don't like you when i'm swinging.
Noik wrote:And Beck that was dumb.
Forkbeard wrote:This Beck kid is a moron.
FB
Return to Fighting Skill Development & Training
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests